WinDbg internal release with CLR support
As explained by Volker von Einem here, WinDbg 6.70.05.0 is special in the sense it has CLR debugging support. Microsoft erred and released this version which is actually internal release. It is not available for download anymore and those who have kept copies are lucky. Worst still, MS never intends to release this CLR support in the foreseeable future.
Just in case if you are that unlucky one and have not got 6.70.05.0 version with you, I digged out a link which seems to work:
hxxp://cert.sjtu.edu.cn/download/mdt/dbg_x86_6.7.05.0.exe
I need to get MD5 hash from Volker since he has original one from MS. I’ll then update this post just to make sure Chinese website has not modified it in anyway.




Did you ever get that MD5 hash?
Alex
February 6, 2009
Nope. But guess what! I usually save my downloads at two locations. When I dug up, voila! I found the 6.7.5.0 version I had downloaded from MS. Let me know if you need it.
Cheers.
NVedala
February 6, 2009
Nice one! I’d really appreciate a copy…
Alex
February 9, 2009
Sorry, I forgot about it. Here’s the MD5 of MY copy.
I checked the file with latest Norton AV but I give no guarantee for correctness:
4be556e2662fe182ee238d7f4d68ff84 *dbg_x86_6.7.05.0.exe
Volker von Einem
February 12, 2009
uh-oh! I’ve used “Express Checksum Calculator” which is freely downloadable. It is showing MD5 of my dbg_x86_6.7.05.0.exe as: 762D3C037D3F50161295E4C8EADB685C
Damn! Not sure whether free calculator doing it correct. Volker, if you don’t mind, can u use the above software to check and let me know?
nvedala
February 12, 2009
Hi nvedala,
Sure would appreciate a copy of your file as well. Thanks.
Alex
Another Alex
May 4, 2009
will send you mail with the link
nvedala
May 5, 2009
I’d appreciate a link to your copy as well
Alandovos
June 24, 2009
If you are still giving out copies, I would really like to get my hands on it.
mike
November 6, 2009
Sure. What is your email id? same as given while commenting?
nvedala
November 10, 2009
yes same email. much thanks. I’m trying to find a memory leak, and version 6.11 doesn’t have the nice bells and whistles.
mike
November 11, 2009